by panic » Wed May 20, 2009 10:18 am
running 16-1 AF Ratio
No reason not to - provided your knock sensor works well, engine has no temperature problems, and your spark advances far enough to make use of the leaner mix.
You're going to see "14.7:1 is the correct air:fuel ratio" posted all over.
The problem is that what happens in the combustion chamber is not a lab experiment, with controlled conditions.
14.7:1 is the ratio that yields no "left-over" air or fuel - exactly the right proportions to combust every fuel molecule and leave nothing on the table... except that it never happens.
There's always some fuel that didn't vaporize enough, or wasn't mixed enough, or cooled off too much from contact with the intake valve, etc. The mixture also never burns in a single complete chemical transaction but is partially burned several times. Guess what: if a fuel molecule isn't burned, what happens to it's oxgen partners? Right - they're left over, even with the correct ratio.
Remember that 14.7:1 is by weight, not volume (which would be far higher), and is air, not oxygen, so of the 14.7 only 2.94 is oxygen (11.61 is nitrogen, .15 is argon).
14.7 is not the best ratio for power - it's too lean. The assumption is that the engine is getting all the air it can use, and if more fuel is added the chance that all the fuel burns goes up (plus a slightly boost from cooling effect). The best ratio depends on how much cooling you need, typically between 12.0 and 13.5:1.
14.7 is not the best ratio for mileage - it's too rich. The assumption is that the engine is getting all the fuel you want to use, and if more air is added the chance that this fuel all burns also goes up. The best ratio depends on how hot the engine runs, how much load it's under, and how much spark advance is available, typically between 15.0 and 18:1.