Four Channel Amps

by **i20solara02i** » Fri Mar 19, 2004 2:09 am

iazuncupidi wrote:JL is the way to go for me.... i have a full Jl system and i love it..

sound is good and the clearity is the bomb.. hahahaha
click on my www and you can see what i have set-up..

ya everyone kinda have their own taste and brand, it also depend on what kind of music you like. some people like hard bumps so people go with jl subs. some like clean bumps like eclipse subs. but not all companies make components, subs, and amps and sound all great. it just depends on your taste.

by **indiglosolara** » Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:57 am

rufus129 wrote:
iazuncupidi wrote:JL is the way to go for me.... i have a full Jl system and i love it..

sound is good and the clearity is the bomb.. hahahaha
click on my www and you can see what i have set-up..

ya everyone kinda have their own taste and brand, it also depend on what kind of music you like. some people like hard bumps so people go with jl subs. some like clean bumps like eclipse subs. but not all companies make components, subs, and amps and sound all great. it just depends on your taste.

very true.....

I say you should go with what you like... I kinda like how the Pheonix gold amps look like. The new series is kinda kool....

by **krawzyazn** » Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:09 am

KICKER is great for the $$$

by **LuckyVal3** » Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:16 am

now when you guys (that includes chrystie too) say clean vs. bump in terms of the sq, which hits lower frequencies? the cleaner sounds or the bumpin ones?
i like the quality of the music - as long as my interior sounds like an orchestra i'm straight - but it's gotta hit low - i don't wanna have any regrets like i sometimes have heard with jl. the only complaint i've ever heard in regards to jl is "i wish it hit a lil harder"...

by **pro956** » Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:36 am

LuckyVal3 wrote:now when you guys (that includes chrystie too) say clean vs. bump in terms of the sq, which hits lower frequencies? the cleaner sounds or the bumpin ones?
i like the quality of the music - as long as my interior sounds like an orchestra i'm straight - but it's gotta hit low - i don't wanna have any regrets like i sometimes have heard with jl. the only complaint i've ever heard in regards to jl is "i wish it hit a lil harder"...

get the jl amp, it'll hit so hard your speakers will break
you will definately be happy, out of everything mentioned thus far, stick with the older ppi's or a jl amp

these ppl that say "i wish it hit a lil harder" did/have poor installations, installation is EVERYTHING. jl amps are highly respected in the industry
don't think i'm just sucking up to them b/c i have them in my car-- i don't
i have a rockford amp, once i get to it, i'll use an earthquake amp and probably an old us acoustics amp

in my opinion jl is too expensive, but their subs/amps are still insane

if you want your system to sound like an orchestra, i think you're going in the wrong direction, you'll need much better speakers, a 3-way system utilizing your kicks, etc etc

get the jl amp/the ppi amp, they are both overkill for your speakers
if i were you, i'd get some dinky 4-channel amp (ie 35-45w rms X 4) maybe an older us acoustics 4056, older rockford, etc etc...

the ppi amp and the jl amp keep the music more natural than anything else mentioned, if u want it to sound even better, you need to raise your budget

by **LuckyVal3** » Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:38 pm

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3084625900
Now, how's that for a good four channel amp?

Does the boy do well, or does the boy do well? :lol:

by **krawzyazn** » Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:06 am

LuckyVal3 wrote:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3084625900
Now, how's that for a good four channel amp?

Does the boy do well, or does the boy do well?

that one sucks you need to get the chrome series

by **LuckyVal3** » Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:41 am

krawzyazn wrote:that one sucks you need to get the chrome series

i didn't know the chrome provides better sound quality. must be the reflective characteristics...

and all this time i thought the PPI PC series was good ('specially for a buck fitty)

by **pro956** » Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:41 am

LuckyVal3 wrote:
krawzyazn wrote:that one sucks you need to get the chrome series

i didn't know the chrome provides better sound quality. must be the reflective characteristics...

and all this time i thought the PPI PC series was good ('specially for a buck fitty)

the amp is fine, u'll be happy-- if it still works
but, i coulda got it to you for cheaper

by **krawzyazn** » Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:26 am

differant year thats all

by **i20solara02i** » Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:42 pm

krawzyazn wrote:differant year thats all

yup

by **ZXLNT** » Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:22 pm

The older AM series PPI's are good as well as the ART series. I think the last of the decent PPI's were the PC series and I always heard the chromes were better than the charcoals. I know they look a hell of lot better..

Website · by **kondo** » Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:30 am

I love PG you can get a used xs series for like $200 on ebay. This is what i have
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... egory=4950
It is hella loud, clear and it has never over heated once.

Nick

Four Channel Amps

Who is online