Midias wrote:I do not know if one is better but the anti fouler is only about $5
Yes this is correct, But thats what makes me wonder if buying a URD sim for $80+ dollars is worth it. The $5 Anti-fouler seems too easy. Where are the "brains" of the forum??? I dont know if pulling the sensor back with the anti-fouler is going to interfere with the cars cpu. This is off URD's site.
Note: Be cautious of O2 sims that replace the rear O2 sensor with a falsely gererated signal.
Toyota started using a wideband type O2 sensor (air/fuel ratio) in the front position for better engine control. These wideband type sensors need to be recalibrated from time to time by the ECU. The ECU uses the rear sensors for this recalibration process. The ECU cannot properly recalibrate the wideband sensor using a falsely generated signal. This process is explained here, US Patent 5706654.
Use only a URD O2 Sensor Simulator on these vehicles to avoid poor performance, drivability issues and poor MPG.
^^ Scare tactic?? Come on guys where are the solid and complicated answers that some of you guys like to show off with??