safc

Website · by **99BlackSandv6** » Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:10 am

Dyno sheets or BAN!!! :lol:

by **ToyoSolV6** » Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:09 pm

No dyno sheet= :ban:

by **michaelr295** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:41 pm

ok well you can call b.s. i dont care my car just got wrecked last month and trying to get the insurance i will post it this week i made 157 hp and 178 tq
i was at 14.9 rich as hell a/f and now after the tune it is 11.1 10.9 around there so if you know any thing about cars and or tuning you would know that you would make more power cause i was putting way too much fuel

so funny i have no reason to b.s. i am only making around 180 hp not like i am saying i make 250 with just a tune

by **jetbtkng** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:58 pm

everyone's just giving u some crap, although i thought you said you got 450 whp with your tune,................ :drinking:

by **trd4life** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:02 pm

"i was at 14.9 rich as hell a/f and now after the tune it is 11.1 10.9 "

14.9 is rich as hell?

by **michaelr295** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:15 pm

14.9 is rich
to much fuel at top end
like between 3000 rpm and 5600rpm

by **michaelr295** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:18 pm

i wish i was making 450 i would not be able to keep tires on the thing to much power for the street to never would hook up

by **hskrsolara** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:32 pm

michaelr295 wrote:14.9 is rich
to much fuel at top end
like between 3000 rpm and 5600rpm

you do understand what "a/f" means?

You had 14.9 parts of air to 1 part of fuel. At WOT, that is LEAN!!! Our normal a/f only gets up to 14.7 at cruising speed.

By getting it down to 11:1, you have 11 parts fuel and 1 part air. You are using MORE fuel than before, and the same amount of air. Now you are running RICH. Most of us aim for 12.5:1. :drinking:

by **JavaJoe_2** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:38 pm

hskrsolara wrote:
michaelr295 wrote:14.9 is rich
to much fuel at top end
like between 3000 rpm and 5600rpm

you do understand what "a/f" means?

You had 14.9 parts of air to 1 part of fuel. At WOT, that is LEAN!!! Our normal a/f only gets up to 14.7 at cruising speed.

By getting it down to 11:1, you have 11 parts fuel and 1 part air. You are using MORE fuel than before, and the same amount of air. Now you are running RICH. Most of us aim for 12.5:1.

Obviously NOT. :oops:

by **Dawgz** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:10 pm

hskrsolara wrote:
michaelr295 wrote:14.9 is rich
to much fuel at top end
like between 3000 rpm and 5600rpm

you do understand what "a/f" means?

You had 14.9 parts of air to 1 part of fuel. At WOT, that is LEAN!!! Our normal a/f only gets up to 14.7 at cruising speed.

By getting it down to 11:1, you have 11 parts fuel and 1 part air. You are using MORE fuel than before, and the same amount of air. Now you are running RICH. Most of us aim for 12.5:1.

11:1 is rich for sure,

i aim for 11.8:1 on my tunes....

by **michaelr295** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:37 pm

woops i was backwards lol
but i am guessing on the 11.1 i have not looked at my graph in a while

but after the tuns i did make more power sorry i wrote it wrong i all ways mix it up lean and rich

by **michaelr295** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:38 pm

i think i was more in the 12 range

by **SirThomas8** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:20 pm

Yeah I'm calling bullshit. I like to give ppl the benefit of the doubt and play nice but I can't help this one.

In his first post he estimated a 10 - 15 hp gain from the tune. Then after the tune he said he went from 150hp to 160hp and 178 tq to 180tq.. And boasted about being correct. Now I see he CHANGED that post (top of pg 2) to say he gained only 157 hp. Now, in his signature he claims his initial HP was 151. So that means only a 6 HP gain.

so um... 10 - 15 HP gain huh?

Current:

michaelr295 wrote:so first dyno run with out safc was 150 hp/178 tq
second run with safc tunned!!!!!!!!
i made 157hp/178tq ya so i am happy
and um i do believe i estimated 10 to 15 hp gain
guess i kinda know what i am talking about

michaelr295 wrote:so first dyno run with out safc was 150 hp/178 tq
second run with safc tunned!!!!!!!!
i made 160hp/180tq ya so i am happy
and um i do believe i estimated 10 to 15 hp gain
guess i kinda know what i am talking about

michaelr295 wrote:and um i do believe i estimated 10 to 15 hp gain
guess i kinda know what i am talking about

Guess not...

by **jetbtkng** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:44 pm

jetbtkng wrote:an safc is really for us sc'ed guys, on an na car i dont think its going to do much, do you have headers, bigger fuel injectors, & your an auto, if your truly at 151hp, i think 3-5 hp gain, imo, but what the hell do i know, im an old senile, pot smoking semi drunk, lol..............

so i was pretty close with my guesstimate, lol............. :drinking:

by **1gSE** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:47 pm

SirThomas8 wrote:......to say he gained only 157 hp.

now that would be some SERIOUS BS lol

safc

Who is online