[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - smaller tires, faster rotation and braking gas mileage
Talk about aftermarket Toyota Solara Gen 2 and 2.5 upgrades.

smaller tires, faster rotation and braking gas mileage

Postby solaracanada » Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:31 pm

stock was 17x7.5, new is 19x8.5. Stock tire size was 215/55/17, new tire size is 235/35/19.
2004 Solara SE Coupe V6, black
Image
Image
User avatar
solaracanada
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:18 pm
Location: GVRD, BC

Postby panic » Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:12 pm

For comparison, the "official" (not exactly accurate due to rim widths, tire pressure, etc. but the usual method) diameters:
215/55-17 = 26.31"
235/35-19 = 25.48"
Change in speed at same RPM: 96.85% (old 60 = new 58.1)
Change in RPM at same speed: 103.26% (old 2,000 = new 2,065)

This should have no effect on your mileage or braking distance that you can notice. The extra tread width may reduce cruising mileage due to rolling resistance, but not much. Mileage under light acceleration should be about the same, because the shorter tire gives you more leverage against the car's weight so for the same G force less torque is needed.

As to the inertia effect?
This one is tough. The most important weight is at the OD, and it's more with the 19 (both the actual wide surface of the rim and the tire), but at a smaller radius than the 17. I can't tell which way it goes.

The leverage of the caliper against the rotor is of course unchanged.

In short, you shouldn't have the symptoms you report - there's something else going on.
panic
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:05 pm
Location: Hempstead, New York

Postby solaracanada » Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:43 pm

panic wrote:For comparison, the "official" (not exactly accurate due to rim widths, tire pressure, etc. but the usual method) diameters:
215/55-17 = 26.31"
235/35-19 = 25.48"
Change in speed at same RPM: 96.85% (old 60 = new 58.1)
Change in RPM at same speed: 103.26% (old 2,000 = new 2,065)

This should have no effect on your mileage or braking distance that you can notice. The extra tread width may reduce cruising mileage due to rolling resistance, but not much. Mileage under light acceleration should be about the same, because the shorter tire gives you more leverage against the car's weight so for the same G force less torque is needed.

As to the inertia effect?
This one is tough. The most important weight is at the OD, and it's more with the 19 (both the actual wide surface of the rim and the tire), but at a smaller radius than the 17. I can't tell which way it goes.

The leverage of the caliper against the rotor is of course unchanged.

In short, you shouldn't have the symptoms you report - there's something else going on.


thx for the analysis, that sounds about right. I dont know why, but everything is fine now. It is still a little worse gas mileage but it is nowhere near the previously reported horrible mileage, it is really close now. As for BRAKING, it actually is way better now. I dont know what the problem was but I am happy that it has worked out now.
2004 Solara SE Coupe V6, black
Image
Image
User avatar
solaracanada
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:18 pm
Location: GVRD, BC

Postby Jon11582 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:06 pm

Maybe because the tires were new. New tires have a coating on them that helps the rubber separate from the molding at the factory. Your running on that coating for the first few hundred miles. After that, the coating is worn off and then they have the traction that are expected from a tire.
Image
2000 Black Solara SE
Jon11582
SolaraGuy Semi-Pro Racer
SolaraGuy Semi-Pro Racer
 
Posts: 2489
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 12:59 pm
Location: Clifton, NJ

Postby panic » Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

I wonder if the ABS and traction control "accept" the new diameter automatically, or do you have to flash the ECM?
panic
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:05 pm
Location: Hempstead, New York
Previous

Return to Aftermarket Gen 2 and 2.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests