*UPDATE* 1mz Estima e-manage plug and play harness?

by **1gSE** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:07 pm

anyone tried this? Would the harness work for us or is it a big difference between the 2?........plug-n-play for a minivan...WTF?

http://www.greddy.com/products/display/ ... ategory=47

by **1gSE** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 6:41 am

46 views and nothing? :roll:

by **Mr_Chunkz** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:11 am

From what I Understood Emanage has to be custom wired into our cars.
I was going to get emanage ultimate but I'm thinkin of AFC Neo instead and then later bumpin to emanage ultimate...

by **i20solara02i** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 2:06 pm

you would have to check the ecu pins to see if they all match the same. also you would have to get how many plugs are it has

by **TMMK Toy** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:02 pm

Hopefully someone can shed some light on this. I'm eager to find out too. Most likely I'm stuck with S-AFC unless some kinda plug and play kit like the emanage becomes available

by **CamryOnBronze** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:21 pm

what setups do you guys have that you need to go full standalone? An SAFC should be plenty of adjustment for running something like a TRD supercharger with more fuel thrown at it. Its such a miniscule adjustment that you dont really need a full standalone do you? I can see it on rich's setup, but not on a fairly standard supercharger setup...

thats my two cents.

by **Mr_Chunkz** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:28 pm

CamryOnBronze wrote:what setups do you guys have that you need to go full standalone? An SAFC should be plenty of adjustment for running something like a TRD supercharger with more fuel thrown at it. Its such a miniscule adjustment that you dont really need a full standalone do you? I can see it on rich's setup, but not on a fairly standard supercharger setup...

thats my two cents.

Im agreed with Damon on this
My original plans were to run a standalone E Manage ultimate with custom wire harness plugged into a Greddy controller screen, the whole setup would have run me pretty close to 1200 wired and everything. Quite frankly its not worth the cost so Im going to run an AFC Neo at first....

by **i20solara02i** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:28 pm

uhmmm... fyi

the greddy emanage is NOT a standalone. it is still an piggyback unit that still relies on your stock ecu to function.

by **Eye8Pussies** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:06 pm

^ lol...I was just about to say that...

and personally, the SAFC is pretty decent...but now that I look back, I shoulda spent a little bit more and picked up an e-manage blue at the very least....more tuning capabilities, including timing

I would say that a full standalone would be over kill for sure though, unless going more than just a trd supercharger

by **i20solara02i** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:02 pm

the greddy emanage blue and ultimate has it own little perk. everyone uses the safc is because it's cheap and looks cool because you have a little box they tells you what's your throttle position is and little things here and there.

the emanage you have the option to throw in how much air/fuel you want at certain rpm range/at throttle position. i think it a little easier to tune with the emanage. rather than the safc because you have a cells where you want to add and subtract fuel. also you advance and retard timing and little other things where i don't think the safc can do.

by **Eye8Pussies** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:06 pm

^ that's exactly why

for me, it was more the fact that the safc was easy to get and the emanage wasn't cheap (or at least I didn't find any) at the time when I was looking for something to tune with

as for the cells, yeah, I heard that those are pretty good to tune with, but I do have to say that the safc is probably the easiest to tune with, especially for something with a linear of a progression as a supercharger

I can't decide though, if it's easier tuning the auto or the standard, since the boost comes on differently with both setups

by **DatSRBoi** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:07 pm

Emanage does more stuff = more happy fined tune in.

SAFC- Does it job at half the cost.

Both reliable. People choose SAFC because of cost. I have seen 600-800whp supra using only SAFC only same with mustangs.

by **Eye8Pussies** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:15 pm

^ now that's impressive....and yet I'm not surprised.

as long as the fuel system itself is mechanically tunable to a point- i.e. external fpr, choice to have it rise with boost or not, one or two fuel pumps, on/off in-line pumps, etc etc. the mechanics can tune itself quite efficiently to a point, and just a bit of a kick here and there with an safc will even things out

by **i20solara02i** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:28 pm

same

i've seen some people with supra just using an safc to tune making 600 hp but with that much hp wth are you thinking, only using an safc + if you have a supra i would think you would invest in an better unit than that.

by **CamryOnBronze** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:56 pm

thats a big my bad... I apologize, I was under the impression that it was a standalone..

I for sure wouldnt spend the money then, :lol:

It is for sure nice to have cells for tuning though, that I can understand, as well as the timing adjustments. For me personally, the price and the convenience of the SAFC are perfect for my setup and what I plan to run. I apologize again, I hate when false info is posted :lol:

UPDATE 1mz Estima e-manage plug and play harness?

UPDATE 1mz Estima e-manage plug and play harness?

Who is online