Injen

by **Down2TheC** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:30 pm

PXLpainter wrote:Why is the heat shield installed on the wrong side of the filter? Is that the "Winter mode" to get more heated air into the engine quicker?

FWIW - I've still never seen any "real" dyno results with OEM/Injen comparison yet. My experience was that it made a lot of noise - and that's about it.

Just as well... cp-e did the measurements and we don't need a heat shield. Gen 1 did.

Also, Injen did release dyno results claiming the same power as cp-e pretty much. It was on their own dyno rather than any standard. Could have been PS for all we know. It's in a thread that's old enough that the search may pick it up. Look for posts by MichaelT and Posh. I think Michael started the thread and Posh did the proto.

by **---CAMRAZY---** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:02 pm

Solara08861 wrote:
Its actually for the Gen6 I4 Camry.

So it might not fit. It might have some clearing issue on the botton end

Never say that.... MAKE IT FIT!

by **Down2TheC** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:07 pm

Astro wrote:
PXLpainter wrote:FWIW - I've still never seen any "real" dyno results with OEM/Injen comparison yet. My experience was that it made a lot of noise - and that's about it.

I don't know what you mean about "real"

I think he meant "independant". But Jeff will be providing that since he has both. Right Jeff? Head to head?

by **PhreakdOut** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:40 pm

RD, your heatshield is on the 2.4L. The author of this thread has a V6. Big difference in intakes.

NightRider, did you check the vacuum tubes to see if they were sealed off by weld? See my injen tutorial in the Gen2 tutorial section.

I found the two tiny tubes to be welded shut. I used a drill and opened them up.

by **RDKamikaze** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:45 pm

I'm interested in learning about that CAI now. I'm not saying I'll take the first jump at it, though. Maybe later I will.

I did that SRI post just for kicks and giggles

by **onefiend** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:31 pm

---CAMRAZY--- wrote:For you 4 cylinder kids, why not get the Fujita CAI?

K&N offers these two for the 2AZ-FE for the tC, I'm sure somebody can get creative and make it fit.

by **NightRider** » Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:19 pm

PhreakdOut wrote:RD, your heatshield is on the 2.4L. The author of this thread has a V6. Big difference in intakes.

NightRider, did you check the vacuum tubes to see if they were sealed off by weld? See my injen tutorial in the Gen2 tutorial section.

I found the two tiny tubes to be welded shut. I used a drill and opened them up.

They are sealed shut. Are you suppose to drill them? I thought they are sealed for a reason? In any case did it make any difference once you drilled them?

by **XEusioN** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:21 am

RDKamikaze wrote:I'm interested in learning about that CAI now. I'm not saying I'll take the first jump at it, though. Maybe later I will.

I did that SRI post just for kicks and giggles

I'm curious, which car was that SRI designed for?

by **RDKamikaze** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:27 am

XEusioN wrote:
RDKamikaze wrote:I'm interested in learning about that CAI now. I'm not saying I'll take the first jump at it, though. Maybe later I will.

I did that SRI post just for kicks and giggles

I'm curious, which car was that SRI designed for?

I have no idea, really. I bought it from i20solara02i as well as my header, but he drives a gen1.5 one. I think it's just for the 2.4L engine in general, but I could be wrong. All I know is that it fits perfectly!

What springs are you running? Do you have the C/O kit, because you're riding really low! I like it a lot.

by **XEusioN** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:25 pm

photoshop

</hijacking>

by **RDKamikaze** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:31 pm

Looks pretty sweet, though! Did you PS the front bumper, too? Or is that some custom-made one or something?

by **indiglosolara** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:43 pm

Fujita makes some really good intakes.
Allot of there products have been proven to have gains better then injen and other companies out there...

But for every cay and application it can vary on your set-up. I would person get Fujita over Injen anyday.. but this is only because its for my xB and not my solara...

I had the Injen on my solara and IMO.. I didn't see any power gains.. I did feel power LOST from the low end side. But it think it was just to make my engine bay look pretty...

but thats all just my opinion..
For the solara's I would probably stick to CP-e since they come with the available tuning piggy back....

by **RDKamikaze** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:46 pm

With my Injen, I noticed a slight increase in the higher RPMs, but a loss in the lowers as well. When I got my header on, however, it helped pull me out of the lower RPMs and into the higher a bit faster, so I think it only helps really when you get the new header.

Just my $.02, I could be wrong? :-?

by **---CAMRAZY---** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:10 pm

XEusioN wrote:photoshop

</hijacking>

Too bad it doesn't really look like that.....

Poser...

ha

by **XEusioN** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:57 pm

---CAMRAZY--- wrote:
XEusioN wrote:photoshop

</hijacking>

Too bad it doesn't really look like that.....

Poser...

ha

Thanks for restating the obvious :roll:

Injen

Who is online