[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - Toyota Press Release 2007 Solara
Stock talk about the Generation 2 and 2.5 Toyota Solara which was released in 2004-2007

Toyota Press Release 2007 Solara

Postby Jack Soulfire » Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:18 pm

Only thing I'm jealous over is the mp3 capability and aux input jack.... which is VERY minor.

Phew... I was worried I'd be missing out on all kinds of crap. My '06 will still suit me fine :)
2006 V6 Solara SE Sport
User avatar
Jack Soulfire
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:54 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Postby Jack Soulfire » Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:20 pm

and the more I look at it... the more I don't like the new front styling.

thumbs down. I like the '04-06 MUCH more.
2006 V6 Solara SE Sport
User avatar
Jack Soulfire
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:54 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Postby hanatsuki » Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:36 pm

joebxr wrote:Maybe it's just me, but I just looked at the 360 views again, and am liking it even less. Even small things like it appear sombrero on deck lid is bigger; Solara lettering on trunk is now block instead of script; with backups in bumper the rear design is looking too busy.... is it me? Am I just being anal here?

PS - They did cut down on the reflective ORANGE on the headlights...decent change.


the 2006 coupe is used for the 360 views

i think the rear ends look kinda aggressive, doesnt seem very solaraish
the curves dunt feel right
What's hot, sexy and has a stick?
Image
my solara v6
hanatsuki
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:43 pm
Location: the OC, CA

Postby cablemn » Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:28 pm

Apparently toyota didnt want to spend much on the new design. This was a case of change for the sake of change. They put squarish ground effects below a swoopy body and took the design backwards to the nineties. Why would they attempt a boy racer spoiler on the trunk and not make improvement on performance. I think it looks much less aggressive in the front and much to busy in the back. our cars have a big a$$ as it is with out having it look even busier back there. They should have done more with the performance of the car than the stlying. 300horse, a lower and more aggressive stance and a manual 6 speed would've been a real nice upgrade instead of what they did to an already sporty and clean looking car. I wouldve liked to see some paint options too like the one they did on the pace car a couple years ago. And dare we forget to mention dual exhaust?
Toyota has always been on some different wacky page with this car and it'll probably never see its true potential as a top luxurod. I guess they dont want to suck sales away from lexus. Does anyone know when the solara is due for a total redesign?
cablemn
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 11:06 am

Postby MCOjerry » Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:36 pm

cablemn wrote:Does anyone know when the solara is due for a total redesign?


Yes, when they discontinue it afther this gen and come out with a totally different model.

http://www.solaraguy.org/viewtopic.php? ... scontinued
2006 SLE V6 Convertible Lunar Mist Metallic w/black top ➬
User avatar
MCOjerry
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:32 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby stockae92 » Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:04 pm

the only thing i like about it is the HID, blue tooth, mp3 capability, aux input, and the gauages looks better than my '06 SLE
2006 Solara SLE V6
stockae92
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Socal

Postby FLUXEMAG » Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:07 am

I saw it in person, it looks bad. Not to mention 210 HP? Wow, forget about more power lets drop it 15HP. Made my day to see a new version of my car that I'm glad I don't have. :) :) :)
************************************
1967 Karmann Ghia Coupe, Rusty White
2005 Solara SE Sport V6, Lunar Mist
2010 G37 Coupe, Moonlight White
User avatar
FLUXEMAG
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 4:57 pm
Location: Scottsdale AZ

Postby PhreakdOut » Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:26 am

FLUXEMAG wrote:I saw it in person, it looks bad. Not to mention 210 HP? Wow, forget about more power lets drop it 15HP. Made my day to see a new version of my car that I'm glad I don't have. :) :) :)


There really isn't a drop. The SAE measurement method has changed so the same engine now has a lower rating. It's marketing's worst nightmare.

See article below ...


Toyota, Honda must fess up to less vroom

New testing standards force carmakers to reduce claims

Nick Bunkley / The Detroit News

Previous report
Asians oversell horsepower

New testing standards are forcing automakers to downgrade horsepower on several of their models. Does a change in horsepower ratings cause you to rethink your next vehicle choice?


It turns out Toyota Motor Corp. isn't as strong as it appears in at least one area -- under the hood.

Testing under stricter new horsepower standards reveals that most of the models in Toyota's lineup have less oomph than the company has advertised. Even though the engines are unchanged, the automaker had to lower the horsepower ratings on all but few 2006 Toyota, Lexus and Scion models. The reductions range from 4 to 20 horsepower compared with 2005 models.

Honda Motor Co., the No. 2 Japanese automaker, also has downgraded the horsepower ratings on several models, including most of its Acura luxury brand.

But while the Japanese automakers overstated their power, an analysis of data compiled by Edmunds.com shows domestic vehicles have generally been testing at or slightly above previously stated horsepower. The testing suggests Detroit's automakers may have suffered unfairly in the battle of perceptions.

While drivers may not notice the difference, said George Peterson, president of consulting firm AutoPacific Inc, "it does matter to the manufacturers because each one is engaged in what I would call a brochure war where they're competing for the best specifications. And the average American likes a bigger horsepower number than a smaller one."

Most notably for Toyota, the rating for its top-selling Camry, when equipped with a 3.3-liter V-6 engine, had to be reduced to 190 horsepower from 210.

The V-6 version of Toyota's Highlander sport utility vehicle dropped from 230 to 215, and the Lexus LS and SC 430 decreased by 12.

The revised ratings comply with standards adopted by the Society of Automotive Engineers.

The standards specify which components and accessories should be on during testing and what kind of oil and fuel to use. To claim an SAE-certified rating, an automaker also must conduct tests in the presence of an independent witness.

"The intent of the revision was to tighten up the specifications," said Gary Pollak, an SAE program manager. "There were a lot of areas that were loose and subject to interpretation."

Peterson doesn't expect Toyota or Honda to face the same kind of backlash that Hyundai Motor Co. did after inflating the horsepower ratings of its U.S. vehicles by as much as 10 percent for more than a decade. The South Korea-based automaker agreed in 2004 to pay $30 million to settle a lawsuit filed on behalf of 858,000 owners.

But for consumers who covet powerful engines and allow horsepower ratings to influence which vehicles they purchase, the revisions could chip away at Honda and Toyota's reputations.

Consumers haven't taken kindly to overhyped claims.

In 2001, Nissan Motor Co. came under fire after overstating the acceleration of its Infiniti Q45 sedan. Ford Motor Co. admitted overstating the horsepower rating of its 1999 Mustang Cobra R, and Mazda Motor Corp. did the same with the 2001 Miata roadster. Buyers of both cars were offered compensation.

The new rating also could make some vehicles less appealing to consumers who start shopping by researching specifications on the Internet. The V-6 Camry's 190 horsepower pales next to competitors such as the 221-horsepower Ford Fusion, although that will change soon when the 2007 Camry is introduced with 268 horses.

Toyota spokesman John McCandless noted that the company was proactive in testing all of its vehicles under the new standards.

"We've never really been big on promoting horsepower," McCandless said. "The proof in the pudding is driving the car."

Darren Seeman, who runs the Web sites ToyotaLife.com, LexusLife.com and ScionLife.com from home in Portland, Ore., doesn't think people who bought a Toyota before the latest tests were conducted will feel misled or cheated. "Honestly, I don't think a lot of people buy a Toyota brand for the horsepower," said Seeman, 29. While Toyota and Honda have subjected their entire lineups to the new standards, Detroit's automakers are mostly retesting vehicles with new powertrains.

Eventually, all vehicles are expected to be rated according to the new standards.

"What we put in place were pretty much common practice at GM, and at Ford and Chrysler as well," said Dave Lancaster, a technical fellow at General Motors Corp. who chaired the committee that developed the standards. GM has submitted results from 11 engine lines -- covering popular vehicles such as the Chevrolet Malibu and Impala, Pontiac G6 and Cadillac DTS -- to SAE for certification. The tests bumped up the horsepower ratings for the Malibu, Impala and G6 by 1 for 2006.

DaimlerChrysler AG has retested its higher-performance vehicles, including the Dodge Viper and those equipped with a Hemi engine. The Viper went from 500 horsepower to 510, while the ratings for most others changed less than 4 percent, Chrysler Group spokesman Cole Quinnell said.

Under the previous guidelines, Quinnell said, "a lot of times we chose to publish a number that was lower than what another manufacturer might choose."

Ford has found virtually no changes in testing under the new standards. Company officials say the new 3.5-liter V-6 planned for the 2007 Ford Edge, Lincoln MKX and Lincoln MKZ will provide at least the 250 horsepower it has promised.

"It's not in our best interest to give customers an inaccurate picture of what kind of power their car has," Ford spokesman Nick Twork said.

Honda saw the horsepower ratings on the Odyssey minivan and Pilot SUV fall from 255 to 244. The CR-V and Element went from 160 to 156. Various Accord styles had slight gains. Six of the seven Acura models were downgraded, including the RL, TL and MDX.

Honda spokesman Chuck Schifsky said the company wanted to be up-front with customers by retesting all of its vehicles, even though that meant reducing many of the horsepower ratings. "We're still pretty darn competitive with all of our vehicles, even with the new specs," Schifsky said.

Honda and Toyota have been educating dealers about the changes. Dan Hurd, a salesman at LaFontaine Toyota in Dearborn, said, "They're more concerned with the drive and the fit and finish."

Seeman, who operates the Web sites, said he doesn't feel any differently about his Lexus SC 430 knowing that it was downgraded from 300 horsepower to 288. "I'm still going to tell people it's 300."

You can reach Nick Bunkley at (313) 222-2293 or nbunkley@detnews.com.
-- The Phreak
'04 350Z 6spd Touring Roadster w/Nav | Megan Racing | Greddy | Nissan Motorsports | Whiteline | Wicked Tuning | Giovanna | Injen | Polished Intake & Throttle Body | Eibach | Central 20 | Stillen | Misc CF Items
User avatar
PhreakdOut
Mod Alumni
Mod Alumni
 
Posts: 4879
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:03 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Postby chuchurocket » Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:14 pm

FLUXEMAG wrote:I saw it in person, it looks bad. Not to mention 210 HP? Wow, forget about more power lets drop it 15HP. Made my day to see a new version of my car that I'm glad I don't have. :) :) :)


under the new SAE measurement it's 210 hp ,whcih means all of our gen 2 laras 04~06 v6s are now measured as 210, it's not a drop, the 07 the same HP as the 04-06
chuchurocket
Just Licensed SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 8:38 pm

Postby solaraluv » Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:44 pm

i dont like it at all! what were they thinking about on the front bumper/ it looks look some sh.it you would find on a hevy Cobalt! and the back is wack! I was hoping for a 3.5 v6 as well as HIDs and maybe the Lexus style gauge display,ill stay with the 06.
Loved by few hated by many
solaraluv
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:19 pm
Location: Boston, Massachusettes

Postby Jack Soulfire » Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:00 pm

The front end of the 2004-2006 with a billet or michael t grille setup looks 10 times better than the 2007, heck even without grille upgrades.

If I were looking at a Solara I'd just buy an '06 and get a great deal instead of forking out for a new model.
2006 V6 Solara SE Sport
User avatar
Jack Soulfire
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:54 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Postby FLUXEMAG » Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:03 pm

That makes sense about the revised HP ratings. Funny how biased the Detroit written article was... Maybe they think they can still sell cars based on size, displacement and horses.
User avatar
FLUXEMAG
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 4:57 pm
Location: Scottsdale AZ

Postby variant » Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:39 pm

jth877 wrote:That front end looks ghey, really bad. The rear is OK except for those reverse lights. What was the purpose of putting in smaller fog lights? Makes the front bumper look like donkey.
did..did you just say Ghey :lol: :lol:

It looks a little better then gen2, a little more aggressive but definately isn't going to keep gen2 owners up at night.
Image
variant
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:03 pm
Location: !San Diego!

Postby PXLpainter » Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:58 pm

PhreakdOut wrote:It turns out Toyota Motor Corp. isn't as strong as it appears in at least one area -- under the hood.

Testing under stricter new horsepower standards reveals that most of the models in Toyota's lineup have less oomph than the company has advertised. Even though the engines are unchanged, the automaker had to lower the horsepower ratings on all but few 2006 Toyota, Lexus and Scion models. The reductions range from 4 to 20 horsepower compared with 2005 models.


Think there will be any class action suits against Toyota for false marketing claims? :-?
Old CarDomain pages here: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2247283
So-long to my 2006 SLE Convertible...
Image
User avatar
PXLpainter
Mod Alumni
Mod Alumni
 
Posts: 6442
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 8:31 pm
Location: Ojai, CA

Postby MCOjerry » Tue Jun 20, 2006 5:05 pm

PXLpainter wrote:
PhreakdOut wrote:It turns out Toyota Motor Corp. isn't as strong as it appears in at least one area -- under the hood.

Testing under stricter new horsepower standards reveals that most of the models in Toyota's lineup have less oomph than the company has advertised. Even though the engines are unchanged, the automaker had to lower the horsepower ratings on all but few 2006 Toyota, Lexus and Scion models. The reductions range from 4 to 20 horsepower compared with 2005 models.


Think there will be any class action suits against Toyota for false marketing claims? :-?


I'll take some cash, or a new car! :lol: I want my 15 HP!
2006 SLE V6 Convertible Lunar Mist Metallic w/black top ➬
User avatar
MCOjerry
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:32 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
PreviousNext

Return to Stock Gen 2 and 2.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests