Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:51 pm
^^ LOL Rudolph - go play with your avatar! GRRrrrrrrOOOWWWLLLL!!!
Drive faster, live longer.
http://www.solaraguy.com/
QuickSEV6 wrote:PXLpainter wrote:Quick - there's a reason that I put this in the Gen 2 Aftermarket forum bro!
Sorry. I didn't see which forum it was on when I clicked on it.
I feel like Rudolph and you won't let me play in your reindeer games.
Good luck with your GB.
Down2TheC wrote:If you go to their site, you'll see they already have a Gen1 set. They claim "20-35whp on '99 V6 5 speed Solara with a TRD Supercharger."
That should be a decent benchmark for Sebas to hope for. As for the bend, It's gonna have to stay to some degree. We have a FWD car. The distance from exhaust valve to the union has to remain the same. So the back headers have to kill some ground before joining up with the front. Thus the bend. Making it wider/rounder can help, but we all should know by now (from Professor Phreak's class) that it's the mashing of the two into one with no increase in size that is killing our flow. Also we have one header that squishes flat to clear something in the engine bay. (I seem to recall... I'll look tomorrow to verify). Brian will swoop in if I've got this all wrong.
So Jeff... count me in. But please discuss the planned lifecycle of the development.
money - proto - dyno - go/nogo - more money - build - ship?
I mean... throw in a catback and we're talking s/c money. So it really has to bring some horses. Props for kicking this off.
Last question... are they going to deal with our O2's. I assume Gen1 had the same rig.
cp-e owners. We'll work with Josh to get a new map made even if I have to drive there for a weekend to do it. (My ride is the model for the '04-'05 a/f map.) Once a new map is available, programmable chips can be reflashed, standard chips would have to be swapped for a small fee. We'd send a deposit, they'd send the new chip, we return the old chip, they return the deposit and keep a bit for processing. That's the deal we hammered out during the proto. (Yes... I prepared for this eventuality. Get me I'm freakin' Carnac.) But we'd be drivable and get a bump with the current map. But a new tuning could provide an even better boost.
Down2TheC wrote:I mean... throw in a catback and we're talking s/c money.
PhreakdOut wrote:The UBend equalizes the length of pipe from manifold to the Y-joint on both the front side and back side manifolds. (To be equal, you add length to the rear manifold run.) This adds to the low end torque.
CosmicGrooves wrote:Hmm... I may have to go in debt for this.
Anyone think they'll have trouble reconfiguring their CP-e?
Astro wrote:I've got the gen1 headers/y-pipe and I'll tell you they are worth every penny!!! High quality parts - for a premium price. But, like mentioned before....you get what you pay for
Ian wrote:Astro wrote:I've got the gen1 headers/y-pipe and I'll tell you they are worth every penny!!! High quality parts - for a premium price. But, like mentioned before....you get what you pay for
Can you elaborate a little more on your recommendation? I'm curious as to the following, but add more if need be. Thanks
1. Performance
2. Sound