by crispone » Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:49 am
Funny!
I am pleased with the RSB + FTSB + TRD SPRINGS combination. (+ CPe... etc...)
I suspect the C/O's ARE much better, but bang-for-buck the springs have been FAR superior to the stock set up. Good ride, good handling, good drop.
My ONLY preference would be:
A little less "bounce/rebound" in the FRONT end (engine weight) after bumps, etc... but other than that, for THIS type of car, the set up is adequate, and pleasantly sporting for more aggressive driving.
NOTE: Don't forget, you TIRE type/profile, etc... will make a BIG difference in how the car rides and suspends as well... and if you go LOW profile tires with larger rims 18/19's, etc... on 45/40 series... you WILL have a "harsher" ride.
Personally, I VERY MUCH like my 50 profile tires for the great ride quality, and maintain "more meat" than many of the guys on here as a result. That is purely preference, but it works for me.
Good luck in your choices.
-crisp
I am pleased with the RSB + FTSB + TRD SPRINGS combination. (+ CPe... etc...)
I suspect the C/O's ARE much better, but bang-for-buck the springs have been FAR superior to the stock set up. Good ride, good handling, good drop.
My ONLY preference would be:
A little less "bounce/rebound" in the FRONT end (engine weight) after bumps, etc... but other than that, for THIS type of car, the set up is adequate, and pleasantly sporting for more aggressive driving.
NOTE: Don't forget, you TIRE type/profile, etc... will make a BIG difference in how the car rides and suspends as well... and if you go LOW profile tires with larger rims 18/19's, etc... on 45/40 series... you WILL have a "harsher" ride.
Personally, I VERY MUCH like my 50 profile tires for the great ride quality, and maintain "more meat" than many of the guys on here as a result. That is purely preference, but it works for me.
Good luck in your choices.
-crisp
-
crispone - Immitagably Verbose Dude
- Posts: 3269
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:40 pm
- Location: Ohio
