[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - Lets talk twin turbo on V6's
For those looking for more speed through force. Forced Induction; Supercharger,Turbocharger or Nitrous discussion and maintenance.

Lets talk twin turbo on V6's

Lets talk twin turbo on V6's

Postby DatSRBoi » Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:14 pm

I been reading around. But what size turbo ISSS THE recommended size for a daily driving stock internal 3.0 litter V6? Im only looking to put out 5 PSI max. And any pictures of how they run down two turbos into one manifold?

FYI- I dont care if Im low boosting. Just a new idea that I WILL achieve. I know it cost money, I didnt say its going to be a one night stand.
[b][color=red]WARNING: MY SIGNATURE MAY CAUSE SEIZURES![/color][/b]
User avatar
DatSRBoi
Grumpy SolaraGuy
Grumpy SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 5411
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 5:33 pm
Location: DFW Texas

Re: Lets talk twin turbo on V6's

Postby Sebas007 » Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:11 am

Maybe it will not helping you but...did you verify how the Supra TT is made....I know that it's a L6 in it but the pattern for the TT should be the same ?? I will try to find better pics for you.

Image

An other link on an old big block engine TT....I've not found any small block V6 TT

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/engine/buick_v6_turbo_block/photo_01.html

DatSRBoi wrote:I been reading around. But what size turbo ISSS THE recommended size for a daily driving stock internal 3.0 litter V6? Im only looking to put out 5 PSI max. And any pictures of how they run down two turbos into one manifold?

FYI- I dont care if Im low boosting. Just a new idea that I WILL achieve. I know it cost money, I didnt say its going to be a one night stand.
Image
Sebas007
SolaraGuy Moderator
SolaraGuy Moderator
 
Posts: 2515
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 4:03 am
Location: Montreal, QC

Re: Lets talk twin turbo on V6's

Postby gLok » Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:47 pm

I haven't done the numbers for a twin setup but you could probably make some good power with leftover turbos. Such as turbos from factory boosted cars like EVOs, DSMs etc etc.

Since you can make good enough power with a single turbo and keep the design more simple, it's the preferred way to go for transverse FWD V6's IMO. I'd love to see a twin turbo 1mz, 3mz or anything of the sort i just think it's more work than it's worth.
99 Camry V6 5 speed - built 1mz +++
90 Integra LS 5 speed - daily beater
http://www.legacytuning.com
http://www.grantscustomrigging.com
gLok
Just Licensed SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 7:35 am
Location: South Florida

Postby Turbosolara » Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:13 pm

its like psssssssssssst ..................BOOM.

you are very likely do not have room for the twin turbo setup. even just for a single turbo is tough already. however, if you can find someone with awsome welding skill and knowledge of turbo set up, you might able to make it. that just my opinion btw, might not be true.

low psi need smallass turbo such as the turbo offer from the burien turbo kit for 5sfe applications. that is the smallest turbo i ever known (i am sure there is a smaller one, but i dont know what are they). supra TT used about T3 sized turbo, which roughly 15psi would be optimum boost
2002 Lexus IS300 5MT
1997 Prelude base, 5MT
Turbosolara
juicy Taiwanese sausage
juicy Taiwanese sausage
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 9:19 pm
Location: Riverside, Loma Linda, Hacienda hts, CA

Postby DatSRBoi » Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:59 pm

Turbosolara wrote:its like psssssssssssst ..................BOOM.

you are very likely do not have room for the twin turbo setup. even just for a single turbo is tough already. however, if you can find someone with awsome welding skill and knowledge of turbo set up, you might able to make it. that just my opinion btw, might not be true.

low psi need smallass turbo such as the turbo offer from the burien turbo kit for 5sfe applications. that is the smallest turbo i ever known (i am sure there is a smaller one, but i dont know what are they). supra TT used about T3 sized turbo, which roughly 15psi would be optimum boost




I already know the turbo will be small, I know I dont have allot of room already. Single turbo are better idea but eh Im trying something new. I definatly Know Ill be low boosting... But one thing for sure, Im not doing this to the solara.
[b][color=red]WARNING: MY SIGNATURE MAY CAUSE SEIZURES![/color][/b]
User avatar
DatSRBoi
Grumpy SolaraGuy
Grumpy SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 5411
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 5:33 pm
Location: DFW Texas

Postby jhenty » Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:37 pm

i like where your heads at. The only challenge really is the space you have to work with, the rest is mostly simple.
2000 Solara SE v6 5-speed (sold)

2005 Subaru legacy GT
1990 BMW 535i
jhenty
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:51 pm

Postby Fletch » Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:48 am

Sorry to be a stick in the mud, but you know it will be a very difficult project, especially the ECU A/F side of it. May I suggest a Gen2 (or whatever the '88-'92 Supra is).
2006 Legacy GT spec.B

(Totaled) '99 SE V6, TRD S/C, 5.5 psi Pulley, Jim's Fuel Upgrade, TRD Shortshifter, SPEC Stage 3 Clutch, Lightweight Flywheel, Tokico / Eibach, TRD RSB, 2.5" Custom Y-Pipe, Greddy Cat-Back
Fletch
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 693
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 1:03 pm
Location: South Bend, Indiana

Postby DatSRBoi » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:12 am

Fletch wrote:Sorry to be a stick in the mud, but you know it will be a very difficult project, especially the ECU A/F side of it. May I suggest a Gen2 (or whatever the '88-'92 Supra is).



Oh no no no no :) Its not for the solara.
[b][color=red]WARNING: MY SIGNATURE MAY CAUSE SEIZURES![/color][/b]
User avatar
DatSRBoi
Grumpy SolaraGuy
Grumpy SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 5411
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 5:33 pm
Location: DFW Texas

Postby Node » Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:33 am

Well, if you want to keep it cheap you can run some DSM turbos. I ran TDO4-HL twins on my 3.4L 5VZFE V6 and they hit 8 psi at about 2700 RPM. If you go with the smaller GenIII Mitsu turbos you should have boost at about the same point.

On the stock internals though 5 psi through an intercooler is probably putting a hurt on the MZ.

Email me for some pics if you want to see the manifold layout.
Node
Just Licensed SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:22 am

Postby ---CAMRAZY--- » Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:42 am

Node wrote:Well, if you want to keep it cheap you can run some DSM turbos. I ran TDO4-HL twins on my 3.4L 5VZFE V6 and they hit 8 psi at about 2700 RPM. If you go with the smaller GenIII Mitsu turbos you should have boost at about the same point.

On the stock internals though 5 psi through an intercooler is probably putting a hurt on the MZ.

Email me for some pics if you want to see the manifold layout.



Speaking of which, where is the AXEL CARRIER BRACKET I paid for a few months ago?? Jim, if you are not going to send it.... just refund me my money.....


Milt...

Here is my paypal for the refund..

miltdoggie@yahoo.com
Image
If there are any haters in here right now that don't have anybody to hate on, feel free to hate on me.-Katt Williams
---CAMRAZY---
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 2:43 pm
Location: ELA

Postby crispone » Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:54 am

You know, I really think the better option would be stay normally aspirated (gen 2) and get a good flow/port job, bump compression a half-to-3/4 point, re-work the headers/exhaust.... have someone trick the tranny valving, etc... run a higher stall Art Carr modded converter, and then tune it right with the CP-e tuneable....

I suspect there is a high-200 number out there with these cars without hurting driveability and reliability too much, and still keep it within several grand.

Turbos bring about so much complexity in terms of injector, timing, gain curves, etc, etc.... to tie into a stock ecu/harness system and stand alones get really costly. (Not to mention the week links all over the system that will need "bumped up" just to HANDLE the increases.... and trying to work on the REAR turbo in a twin setup on a transvers V6? Seems NUTS to me....)

Besides.... the PLUMBING is REALLY gonna get tricky, cramped, HOT, and COSTLY with a full-blown induction system on one of these.... me thinks.

Anyway.... someone needs to breathe on a N/A gen 2 real hard and report back.... maybe I'll do it in a year or two....


-crisp :evilbat:
User avatar
crispone
Immitagably Verbose Dude
Immitagably Verbose Dude
 
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby DatSRBoi » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:29 am

crispone wrote:You know, I really think the better option would be stay normally aspirated (gen 2) and get a good flow/port job, bump compression a half-to-3/4 point, re-work the headers/exhaust.... have someone trick the tranny valving, etc... run a higher stall Art Carr modded converter, and then tune it right with the CP-e tuneable....

I suspect there is a high-200 number out there with these cars without hurting driveability and reliability too much, and still keep it within several grand.

Turbos bring about so much complexity in terms of injector, timing, gain curves, etc, etc.... to tie into a stock ecu/harness system and stand alones get really costly. (Not to mention the week links all over the system that will need "bumped up" just to HANDLE the increases.... and trying to work on the REAR turbo in a twin setup on a transvers V6? Seems NUTS to me....)




Never said it was going to be easy nor reliable.

Besides.... the PLUMBING is REALLY gonna get tricky, cramped, HOT, and COSTLY with a full-blown induction system on one of these.... me thinks.

Anyway.... someone needs to breathe on a N/A gen 2 real hard and report back.... maybe I'll do it in a year or two....


-crisp :evilbat:
[b][color=red]WARNING: MY SIGNATURE MAY CAUSE SEIZURES![/color][/b]
User avatar
DatSRBoi
Grumpy SolaraGuy
Grumpy SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 5411
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 5:33 pm
Location: DFW Texas

Postby DatSRBoi » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:32 am

crispone wrote:You know, I really think the better option would be stay normally aspirated (gen 2) and get a good flow/port job, bump compression a half-to-3/4 point, re-work the headers/exhaust.... have someone trick the tranny valving, etc... run a higher stall Art Carr modded converter, and then tune it right with the CP-e tuneable....

I suspect there is a high-200 number out there with these cars without hurting driveability and reliability too much, and still keep it within several grand.

Turbos bring about so much complexity in terms of injector, timing, gain curves, etc, etc.... to tie into a stock ecu/harness system and stand alones get really costly. (Not to mention the week links all over the system that will need "bumped up" just to HANDLE the increases.... and trying to work on the REAR turbo in a twin setup on a transvers V6? Seems NUTS to me....)


Besides.... the PLUMBING is REALLY gonna get tricky, cramped, HOT, and COSTLY with a full-blown induction system on one of these.... me thinks.

Anyway.... someone needs to breathe on a N/A gen 2 real hard and report back.... maybe I'll do it in a year or two....


-crisp :evilbat:



Never said it was going to be easy nor reliable.
[b][color=red]WARNING: MY SIGNATURE MAY CAUSE SEIZURES![/color][/b]
User avatar
DatSRBoi
Grumpy SolaraGuy
Grumpy SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 5411
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 5:33 pm
Location: DFW Texas

Postby crispone » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:37 am

DatSRBoi wrote:
crispone wrote:You know, I really think the better option would be stay normally aspirated (gen 2) and get a good flow/port job, bump compression a half-to-3/4 point, re-work the headers/exhaust.... have someone trick the tranny valving, etc... run a higher stall Art Carr modded converter, and then tune it right with the CP-e tuneable....

I suspect there is a high-200 number out there with these cars without hurting driveability and reliability too much, and still keep it within several grand.

Turbos bring about so much complexity in terms of injector, timing, gain curves, etc, etc.... to tie into a stock ecu/harness system and stand alones get really costly. (Not to mention the week links all over the system that will need "bumped up" just to HANDLE the increases.... and trying to work on the REAR turbo in a twin setup on a transvers V6? Seems NUTS to me....)


Besides.... the PLUMBING is REALLY gonna get tricky, cramped, HOT, and COSTLY with a full-blown induction system on one of these.... me thinks.

Anyway.... someone needs to breathe on a N/A gen 2 real hard and report back.... maybe I'll do it in a year or two....


-crisp :evilbat:



Never said it was going to be easy nor reliable.


Hey, that's cool.... go for it.... you have my support.

-crisp :evilbat:
User avatar
crispone
Immitagably Verbose Dude
Immitagably Verbose Dude
 
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Node » Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:17 pm

---CAMRAZY--- wrote:Speaking of which, where is the AXEL CARRIER BRACKET I paid for a few months ago?? Jim, if you are not going to send it.... just refund me my money.....


Milt...

Here is my paypal for the refund..

miltdoggie@yahoo.com


I left you voicemail message today and PMed you, I had no idea you had not recived it yet. Im so sorry I have been out of reach. Again, im sort of the third party here. I will be happy to send you aother one or personally refund your money (watever is better for you). I can overnight another bracket to you. I really want to help, just let me know what you want me to do.

Jim
Why do my transmissions turn to slush? Oh yea,

3.4L 5VZ-FE V6, 60 Trim T4/T3, A2W supercooler, Port ethanol injection, MS2-R3, EDIS etc...
Node
Just Licensed SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:22 am
Next

Return to Forced Induction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests