MP90 Custom S/C Dyno Testing Scheduled

by **jetbtkng** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:33 pm

its a piston issue with the stock 3.0, thier weak, plus 10.5-1 compression, ring gap, rings are to close to each other, when i had my pistons made , i had them make the rings farther apart than the stock piston, plus mine are forged............ :drinking:

by **Dawgz** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:39 pm

jetbtkng wrote:its a piston issue with the stock 3.0, thier weak, plus 10.5-1 compression, ring gap, rings are to close to each other, when i had my pistons made , i had them make the rings farther apart than the stock piston, plus mine are forged............

Cool...should put out a decent amount of power....what about the trans?

by **WUTANGCLAN** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:39 pm

wow I'm just creaming in my khakis thinking about this kit

by **trd4life** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:18 pm

I may end up getting a loan from the bank to pay my machinist for his magic. I need everyone with genuine interest in this kit to email me at gabe_potter@hotmail.com showing your interest in my kit. i will forward this info on to my bank in the form of a business plan so that i can fund the remainder of the project.

Please spread the word and tell people that you know are interested to email me as well.

thanks guys!

Gabe

by **TxBmbleBee** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:08 pm

gabe what about the egr system with this setup? will it throw check engine lights or are egr pipes being made? i know the egr is stupid but im from tx, and you cant get a damn sticker with a cel

Website · by **99BlackSandv6** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:33 pm

So since boost is being tested at levels that the TRD unit can achieve, I guess the main difference should be air temps. right? Is there any way you guys can compare the boosted air temps. of the two setups (TRD vs. MP90)? I just think it would be a nice bit of info to have, since that's the main advantage of the larger blower.

by **Dawgz** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:10 pm

99BlackSandv6 wrote:So since boost is being tested at levels that the TRD unit can achieve, I guess the main difference should be air temps. right? Is there any way you guys can compare the boosted air temps. of the two setups (TRD vs. MP90)? I just think it would be a nice bit of info to have, since that's the main advantage of the larger blower.

main difference will be temps and more importantly, volume.

by **Eye8Pussies** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:18 pm

Can't wait to see the results, but same as Vik, I wonder how it would do on a stock motor... Hmmm...

by **Dawgz** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:23 pm

Eye8Pussies wrote:Can't wait to see the results, but same as Vik, I wonder how it would do on a stock motor... Hmmm...

I bet the m90 will make the supra red top injectors feel like stock 1mz injectors lol....

by **Gibson99** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:58 am

pretty impressive sounding! did you go with an 8-rib belt or stick with a 6-rib? new idler plate assy or same? dynamic tensioner or back to using the alternator to set belt tension?

by **trd4life** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:47 am

6 rib. Same idler assembly. EGR flange will on the TB inlet but it will be the responsibility of the buyer to plump their own EGR tube. I decided not to do the R&D on designing the new EGR tube due to costs. Dynamic tensioner setup but if customers want manual tensioner plates i can make that happen as well.

by **trd4life** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:48 am

So far no emails received showing interest. I wonder if me, Frank, BBQ Bob, and Greg are going to be the only ones to run these.....

Website · by **99BlackSandv6** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:20 pm

It's high dollar item. I'd be interested if it didn't cost 70% the total value of the car. I hope there are more guys interested though.

Also, the displacement of the charger only helps because the charger doesn't have to spin as fast to create the same amount of boost right? And because it is turning slower it will run cooler as well? And with the higher displacement the charger has higher boost capabilities right? Just for clarification.

by **akora12** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:29 pm

I'm in. I'll send an e-mail following this message.

by **Eye8Pussies** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:32 pm

99BlackSandv6 wrote:It's high dollar item. I'd be interested if it didn't cost 70% the total value of the car. I hope there are more guys interested though.

Also, the displacement of the charger only helps because the charger doesn't have to spin as fast to create the same amount of boost right? And because it is turning slower it will run cooler as well? And with the higher displacement the charger has higher boost capabilities right? Just for clarification.

yup...it's about moving the same amount or more, volume of air, more efficiently (less heat produced, less strain on crank, etc.)

MP90 Custom S/C Dyno Testing Scheduled

Who is online