CASTRO wrote:I installed my s/c @ 130,000 miles. Currently @ 175,000 miles with the s/c on. Since the car hit 100,000 miles, it has seen countless Auto-X and open track events 5-6hrs a day. Still on the original everything except brake pads. Just as long as your car is treated right, it can survive anything.
Oh yeah: I beat on my car, but its also spoiled when daily driven
-Regular oil changes from the day it was bought @ 3000miles with Fully Synthetic Mobile 1
-Installed a tranny cooler @ 100,000 miles
-ATF drain/fill @ every other oil change or track event with Mobile1 Full Synthetic ATF
-Coolant changed every 15k
-Spark plugs changed every 20k or when the s/c comes off
^^^^ THERE you go! I think CASTRO is RIGHT ON THE MONEY with his diligent care of the vehicle.
For reference, I have reviewed technical papers that have indicated TURBO inducted vehicles have an inherent degradation of around 10% over Normally Aspirated vehicles, IF MAINTAINED ACCORDINGLY! OF COURSE, this study was STARTING with a vehicle that is N/A and TURBO at the outset, but the point is: TURBO (or other induction) WILL cause SOME degradation, but NOT NECESSARILY EXCESSIVE. (10% is a pretty simple calculation... if your car WOULD have survived 200K, then shave 20K miles off it's similar lifespan with the boost.)
I think others here are making the MORE IMPORTANT point on SUB-SYSTEMS such as the TRANNY that may deteriorate more rapidly. I just consider THOSE components as "CONSUMABLES", which, in fact they ARE. Replacing with BETTER components is always a good idea, and would likely breath fresh life into a "higher" mileage vehicle ANYWAY... and WELCOME the added power as a package upgrade.
Just think BALANCE and PREVENTATIVE (or PREDICTIVE) maintenance.
Mind your "P's and Q's" and GO FOR IT.... I'd say. I'm at 56k miles with my gen 2, and I'd jump ALL OVER an s/c if one were available... I'd ALSO make OTHER upgrades to handle it, however.
-crisp
