[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - before i order an intake...
Talk about aftermarket Toyota Solara Gen 1-1.5 upgrades.

before i order an intake...

Postby crispone » Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:40 am

unbalancedwood wrote:I think weve seen dyno numbers on the cpe, its deff. around 15hp for a gen1....redgen1 comes to mind first because hes local to me, he dynod w/ the cpe...



Image
Image




Regardless of absolute numbers, GAIN is GAIN. On the same dyno back-to-back, the above translates into a percentage of performance gain. That number is real, and every stab at the throttle will validate it with absolution every time you turn the key.


Case closed.




-crisp :evilbat:
User avatar
crispone
Immitagably Verbose Dude
Immitagably Verbose Dude
 
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby crispone » Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:45 am

Another important point... it's NOT just about the GAIN alone... but WHERE do you achieve the gain? In BOTH curves, you get the SAME peak power (or relative power) at various RPM points (such as absolute peaks comparison point) and the addition of the CP-e mod nets the SAME HP or TORQUE as the stock curve at 500~750 RPM EARLIER in the motors spool! THAT'S what you FEEL and notice as response!


Then consider that from having the SAME power as a stock 'lara nearly 1000 rpm earlier in the rev band, and CONTINUE to climb at the same gain/rate for the duration of the curve...





Anyway... something like that...



-crisp :evilbat:
User avatar
crispone
Immitagably Verbose Dude
Immitagably Verbose Dude
 
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby jetbtkng » Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:28 am

where are the dyno #'s for injen to compare with those charts, if thats only cpe then posting those #'s are a mute point, as this was a comparision dicussion of intakes................. :drinking:
User avatar
jetbtkng
solaraguy idiot racing team
solaraguy idiot racing team
 
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: bell garbage ca. so. cal.

Postby 99V6solaraSE » Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:59 am

i know its already been said a lot...

But ive had both injen and cp-e. And I have to say it wasn't even CLOSE at all.. The cp-e by far felt like it had the better gains and was totally worth it to me.

anyone have dyno numbers from an auto NA with an injen?
Blown @ 5.5PSI w/ xerd, 3inch jpp, tunable cpe Automatic... SOLD
2010 Mazdaspeed 3 ZOOM-ZOOM B)
User avatar
99V6solaraSE
SolaraGuy Street Racer
SolaraGuy Street Racer
 
Posts: 1016
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 6:31 am
Location: Jacksonville/Gainesville

Postby crispone » Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:17 pm

jetbtkng wrote:where are the dyno #'s for injen to compare with those charts, if thats only cpe then posting those #'s are a mute point, as this was a comparision dicussion of intakes................. :drinking:




You aren't reading very closely. I've been quantifying my statements as RELATIVE to the improvement that can be expected IN THE CASE OF THE CP-E!


I have not ONCE made a comparison between the two... simply stated my opinion that the CP-e IS a good performance upgrade, and now posted (albeit someone elses... the manufacturer, in this case) EMPIRICAL evidence to support my butt-sense from driving my car with and without it.



I stand by all my statements.




-crisp :evilbat:
User avatar
crispone
Immitagably Verbose Dude
Immitagably Verbose Dude
 
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby yaddadaimsayin » Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:19 pm

and as usual, i stand by the immitagably verbose dude's statements. :up:
l CP-e Intake l TRD Lowered/Exhaust/RSB l 20/5 Tints l Custom Grille l Alpine HU l Rocksford Amp l 2 10" JBL Subs l 6000k HID l Smoked 2.5 Tails l Satisfied Driver l
Image
User avatar
yaddadaimsayin
SolaraGuy Semi-Pro Racer
SolaraGuy Semi-Pro Racer
 
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:26 am
Location: The Bay where we Hyphy and Go Dumb!

Postby jetbtkng » Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:40 pm

all we need is for a na guy to compare the 2, whos got a cpe, i'll take the injen off my black lara cause its being painted, i'll get fernando, to put them on his car, take it to the dyno shop, and we'll find out, i'll even pay for dyno, and we'll get the #'s, what does what............... :drinking:
User avatar
jetbtkng
solaraguy idiot racing team
solaraguy idiot racing team
 
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: bell garbage ca. so. cal.

Postby Dawgz » Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:56 pm

wow....@ this thread.


Heres the run down.

If ur N/A and u get the injen intake (with out tune) or the CPE with out using the tunable box....ur results will be similar.

The real gain you will see is when you tune after installing either one to take advantage of the extra air at which ever RPM.

it really just comes down to ur budget.
--=Black on Black=-- (Sold)
User avatar
Dawgz
SolaraGuy Professional Racer
SolaraGuy Professional Racer
 
Posts: 4678
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:28 pm

Postby kenny6683 » Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:24 pm

the debate is pretty good here lol...if you guys ever get the actually numbers from dyno let me know, very curious. if injen only does 10 hp gain and CP-e does 12 then i would rather save the extra cash
Image
User avatar
kenny6683
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:47 pm
Location: Queens NYC

Postby 99BlackSandv6 » Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:01 pm

OK OK, his opinion of one being better than the other is one thing. But actual performance testing and determining EXACT performance differences between the different systems is as OBJECTIVE as it gets.

That's what we need, one person, with one car, in one day, testing the intakes against one another on a dyno.

If anyone wants to donate a CP-e to me let me know.
Trust me, I'm a technician.
Image
User avatar
99BlackSandv6
SolaraGuy Street Racer
SolaraGuy Street Racer
 
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: P-burg, WV

Postby crispone » Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:11 pm

99BlackSandv6 wrote:OK OK, his opinion of one being better than the other is one thing. But actual performance testing and determining EXACT performance differences between the different systems is as OBJECTIVE as it gets.

That's what we need, one person, with one car, in one day, testing the intakes against one another on a dyno.

If anyone wants to donate a CP-e to me let me know.



I'm all for finding out what the results of comparative testing would be. :up:


Happy with my choice, and certain that it is an improvement over stock, and even more certain that it was worth the cost FOR ME. :wink:



Best of choices to everyone else!


-crisp :evilbat:
User avatar
crispone
Immitagably Verbose Dude
Immitagably Verbose Dude
 
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby crispone » Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:11 pm

yaddadaimsayin wrote:and as usual, i stand by the immitagably verbose dude's statements. :up:



Thank you, sir! :D







-crisp :evilbat:
User avatar
crispone
Immitagably Verbose Dude
Immitagably Verbose Dude
 
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby x99suplarax » Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:02 pm

when i get my knock sensors replaced ill do a run with the cpe intake in a day or two..

http://www.solaraguy.com/viewtopic.php?t=45529&start=15 <-- this is with injen intake
1999 toyota camry solara se v6 5 speed 178hp and 182tq
User avatar
x99suplarax
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:44 pm

Postby jetbtkng » Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:23 pm

now were getting some where, when you did your last dyno how hot or cold was it outside, and also humidity plays a role, atleast there will be something to compare the 2.................... :drinking:
User avatar
jetbtkng
solaraguy idiot racing team
solaraguy idiot racing team
 
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: bell garbage ca. so. cal.

Postby x99suplarax » Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:57 am

jetbtkng wrote:now were getting some where, when you did your last dyno how hot or cold was it outside, and also humidity plays a role, atleast there will be something to compare the 2.................... :drinking:


60 something degrees

Dawgz wrote:wow....@ this thread.


Heres the run down.

If ur N/A and u get the injen intake (with out tune) or the CPE with out using the tunable box....ur results will be similar.

The real gain you will see is when you tune after installing either one to take advantage of the extra air at which ever RPM.

it really just comes down to ur budget.


i guess i cant do it then.. cuz the cpe i have right now isnt tuneable.. hmm i guess i should get the tuneable asap to gain hp and to get me out of being rich..
1999 toyota camry solara se v6 5 speed 178hp and 182tq
User avatar
x99suplarax
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:44 pm
PreviousNext

Return to Aftermarket Gen1 and 1.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests