JMSinMaryland wrote:Im not trying to step on James's feet because he is the resident audio guru, but the best systems/amps/speakers/etc I have heard are Focal, followed by Diamond, followed by McIntosh. Jon.
I'd agree with much of what you are saying (with a few other lines added in, and slight ranking differences)...
What I disagree with, however, is matching a $1000 amp to a $150 set of speakers (or a $150 amp to a $1000 set of speakers for that matter)... In my experience, you will run into a concept referred to as "diminishing marginal returns" (yea, a big economic term) when powering unmatched sets... In this case, the speakers will become the bottle neck in the setup and you experience very little, if any difference in performance over running a slightly lesser amp that better matches the set of speakers. Likewise, you can keep a middle end amp and upgrade from a matched set of speakers to a top end set of speakers and experience very little gain in quality... As a matter of fact, if the amp isn't sufficient, you can LOSE quality...
He already has his mids and highs (Alpine Type Rs) and his subs (JL 10"s, I'm guessing W3s for middle ground)... Sure, you can push them with a Diamond or a McIntosh, however would the increase in SQ / Performance really justify the cost difference over an upper-middle end set of matched amps? I question the validity from a pro standpoint, let alone from a casual listner's...
The key is to be happy with the way your system sounds... Everyone has their own tastes, and there are setups that can appeal to anyone. My personal recommendation is to get the most of what you got, with the least amount of sacrifice (budget, space, weight, whatever other limits you may have). Considering the speakers he's running, and the fact that he just inquired about a $150 Boss amp, I ain't gonna try to shove a $800+ (each) Diamond or McIntosh down his throat... It's a balancing act, and there's really no need to over-do one end of the spectrum while leaving the other end behind.
Peace,
-James